The good …
Let's start with a brief history review. Once upon a
time, in a land far, far away, somebody had a bright idea to create
Linux, a "UN*X for the masses." As the story goes, the development
process was initiated by a worldwide team of dedicated hobbyists who
embarked on a noble quest to craft the best operating system ever.
Considering the humble beginnings, it is amazing that this once
purely recreational project is still going strong after all these
years.
The initial push that reinforced this ambitious effort
came from Linux's ability to carve itself a niche among those most
dissatisfied with the predominance of MS-DOS and Windows, myself
included. Not even in our wildest dreams could we imagine that our
new play toy would eventually become "the next big thing." At the
time, all we really wanted was to have some fun with software that
was very much like the stuff that only the chosen few network
administrators were allowed to touch.
Then suddenly, a mere decade after Linux was
conceived, all hell broke loose. Nowadays, even in the darkest
corners of the Net, one can't help but hear about the modern-day
miracles of Open Source. The word is out there that Linux has
evolved into one of the most crash-resistant platforms ever. Some of
the most vigorous defenders of the Open Source notion go as far as
to declare that their beloved system is so good that it can run a
Web server for a large e-commerce venture off a single 386-based
computer. While these and other exaggerated claims might not be
entirely true, the fact is that this allegedly groundbreaking
software is still readily available at no cost whatsoever.
The bad…
Inspired by Richard Stallman's altruism, a handful of
daydreamers continue to concentrate on writing free code in a vain
attempt to make the world a better place. However, for many of their
colleagues, Linux is all about gaining market share, setting IPO
records, executing corporate takeovers, and boosting egos. Out of
the blue, it also turned out that the operating system, which was
brought into the spotlight by a relatively small group of part-time
hobbyists, needs hundreds of millions of dollars to continue to
evolve.
In a few short years, Linux has grown from a mere
curiosity into a multi-billion business that is now poised to take
over the entire industry. The early nineties idealism has largely
cleared the way for a corporate greed fest for the new millennium.
Almost overnight, the cute little penguin has started to resemble a
hungry wild predator, while also gaining the notorious status of a
heavily guarded "holy cow". Anybody brave enough to say something
remotely critical about Linux is risking being "flamed" to
death.
Not only that, but the one attribute of the original
Open Source movement that remains intact is its bitterly
anti-Microsoft nature. The main difference is that it is no longer
fueled by a desperate crusade of some disgruntled teenagers against
the "Evil Empire." Instead, all the corporations that were once
bruised by Bill Gates' furious marketing machine, are starting to
see Linux as their newfound weapon. Companies like Sun, Corel,
Inprise (Borland), and Caldera (Digital Research), have been selling
proprietary software since the beginning of time, are unexpectedly
coming out of the closet with a pledge to "reinvent" themselves as
energetic Open Source supporters.
…and some more food for
thought
The situation wouldn't be so alarming if not for three
additional factors that must be taken into consideration. First of
all, I have yet to see a solid proof that any business model based
on trying to make money on something that is 100% free is
sustainable in the long run. According to IDC, Linux
already controls 25% of all server OS shipments yet accounts for far
less than 1% of total revenue in the market. Over time, more
people will get broadband access and discover that Linux can be
downloaded for free. That will make it increasingly more difficult
to sell any boxed CD sets at all. Furthermore, if the Linux
community can deliver on the ease-of-use promise, the market for
related support and maintenance will continue to shrink as well.
Secondly, it is still premature to claim that publicly
developed products will always have some inherent advantages over
their commercial counterparts. In fact, so far Linux is one of only
a small number of Open Source projects that have proven to be
victorious, if only in the server arena. One notable fiasco that
comes to mind is Mozilla.org,
a volunteer-driven organization that has (IMHO) yet to come up with
a single meaningful upgrade to the once-dominant browser.
Thirdly, we must not lose sight of the fact that
beyond the far fetched philosophical implications of the Open Source
arguments lies recycled UN*X technology, which is literally decades
old. In reality, from an ordinary end user's perspective,
there is hardly anything unique (or "innovative," if you allow me to
use this tired word) about Linux's look-and-feel. For some unknown
reason, all of the popular Linux GUI's are disturbingly similar in
appearance to, of all things, Microsoft Windows. And, while Linux's
interface is almost infinitely customizable, it lacks consistency
that many of us have grown to appreciate. Moreover, as a matter of
opinion, few of the usability improvements are revolutionary.
Isn't it
ironic?
This whole story is jam-packed with paradoxes. A
product that was developed in an attempt to fight market
monopolization, is quickly elbowing its way to becoming the next
monopoly (Assuming that term can be applied to open source
software). The Open Source movement, which was originally
positioned as a non-profit alternative to the opulent establishment,
is soaking in money. And, the same people who, not so long ago,
aspired to make Linux strive on its technological merits alone, are
now often resorting to the same dreaded marketing tricks that turned
them away from earlier commercial operating systems in the first
place.
As they say, what goes around, comes around.